SpaceX’s plan to fly you across the globe in 30 minutes | Gwynne Shotwell

SpaceX’s plan to fly you across the globe in 30 minutes | Gwynne Shotwell

Chris Anderson: So two months ago,
something crazy happened. Can you talk us through this, because
this caught so many people’s attention? Gwynne Shotwell: I’ll stay quiet
for the beginning, and then I’ll start talking. (Video) Voices: Five, four,
three, two, one. (Cheering) Woman: Liftoff. Go Falcon Heavy. GS: So this was such
an important moment for SpaceX. With the Falcon 9
and now the Falcon Heavy, we can launch into orbit any payload that has previously
been conceived or is conceived right now. We’ve got a couple of launches
of Falcon Heavy later this year, so this had to go right. It was the first time we flew it, and the star of the show, of course, brother and sister side boosters landing. I was excited. (Laughter) Thanking my team. By the way, there’s maybe
a thousand people standing around me right there. And Starman. Starman did not steal the show, though — the boosters did. CA: (Laughter) CA: There had to be some payload —
why not put a Tesla into space? GS: Exactly. It was perfect. CA: Gwynne, let’s wind the clock back. I mean, how did you end up an engineer
and President of SpaceX? Were you supernerdy as a girl? GS: I don’t think I was nerdy, but I was definitely doing the things
that the girls weren’t doing. I asked my mom, who was an artist,
when I was in third grade, how a car worked, so she had no idea so she gave me
a book, and I read it, and sure enough, my first job
out of my mechanical engineering degree was with Chrysler Motors
in the automotive industry. But I actually got into engineering
not because of that book but because my mom took me
to a Society of Women Engineers event, and I fell in love with
the mechanical engineer that spoke. She was doing really critical work, and I loved her suit. (Laughter) And that’s what a 15-year-old
girl connects with. And I used to shy away
from telling that story, but if that’s what caused me
to be an engineer — hey, I think we should talk about that. CA: Sixteen years ago, you became
employee number seven at SpaceX, and then over the next years, you somehow built a multi-billion-dollar
relationship with NASA, despite the fact that SpaceX’s
first three launches blew up. I mean, how on earth did you do that? GS: So actually, selling rockets
is all about relationships and making a connection
with these customers. When you don’t have a rocket to sell, what’s really important
is selling your team, selling the business savvy of your CEO — that’s not really hard
to sell these days — and basically, making sure
that any technical issue that they have or any concern,
you can address right away. So I think it was helpful
for me to be an engineer. I think it was helpful to my role
of running sales for Elon. CA: And currently,
a big focus of the company is, I guess, kind of a race with Boeing to be the first to provide
the service to NASA of actually putting humans into orbit. Safety considerations obviously
come to the fore, here. How are you sleeping? GS: I actually sleep really well.
I’m a good sleeper, that’s my best thing. But I think the days leading up
to our flying crew will probably be a little sleepless. But really, fundamentally,
safety comes in the design of the system that you’re going
to fly people on, and so we’ve been working for years, actually, almost a decade,
on this technology. We’re taking the Dragon cargo spaceship and we’re upgrading it
to be able to carry crew. And as I said, we’ve been
engineering in these safety systems for quite some time. CA: So isn’t it that there’s one system
that actually allows instant escape if there’s a problem. GS: That’s right. It’s called
the launch escape system. CA: I think we have that. Let’s show that. GS: We’ve got a video
of a test that we ran in 2015. So this simulated having
a really bad day on the pad. Basically, you want the capsule
to get out of Dodge. You want it to get away from the rocket that had a bad day right below it. This is if there was an issue on the pad. We also will be doing
another demonstration later this year on if we have an issue
with the rocket during flight. CA: And those rockets have another
potential function as well, eventually. GS: Yeah, so the launch escape system
for Dragon is pretty unique. It’s an integrated launch escape system. It’s basically a pusher, so the propellant system and the thrusters
are integrated into the capsule, and so if it detects a rocket problem,
it pushes the capsule away. Capsule safety systems in the past
have been like tractor pullers, and the reason we didn’t want to do that is that puller needs to come off before
you can safely reenter that capsule, so we wanted to eliminate, in design,
that possibility of failure. CA: I mean, SpaceX has made
the regular reusability of rockets seem almost routine, which means you’ve done something that no national
space program, for example, has been able to achieve. How was that possible? GS: I think there’s a couple of things — there’s a million things, actually — that have allowed SpaceX to be successful. The first is that we’re kind of standing
on the shoulders of giants. Right? We got to look at the rocket industry
and the developments to date, and we got to pick the best ideas, leverage them. We also didn’t have technology
that we had to include in our vehicle systems. So we didn’t have to design
around legacy components that maybe weren’t the most reliable
or were particularly expensive, so we really were able to let physics
drive the design of these systems. CA: I mean, there are other programs
started from scratch. That last phrase you said there,
you let physics drive the design, what’s an example of that? GS: There’s hundreds of examples,
actually, of that, but basically, we got to construct
the vehicle design from, really, a clean sheet of paper, and we got to make decisions
that we wanted to make. The tank architecture —
it’s a common dome design. Basically it’s like two beer cans
stacked together, one full of liquid oxygen, one full of RP, and that basically saved weight. It allowed us to basically take
more payload for the same design. One of the other elements of the vehicle
that we’re flying right now is we do use densified
liquid oxygen and densified RP, so it’s ultracold, and it allows you to pack
more propellent into the vehicle. It is done elsewhere, probably not to the degree that we do it, but it adds a lot
of margin to the vehicle, which obviously adds reliability. CA: Gwynne, you became President
of SpaceX 10 years ago, I think. What’s it been like to work
so closely with Elon Musk? GS: So I love working for Elon. I’ve been doing it for 16 years
this year, actually. I don’t think I’m dumb enough
to do something for 16 years that I don’t like doing. He’s funny and fundamentally without
him saying anything he drives you to do your best work. He doesn’t have to say a word. You just want to do great work. CA: You might be the person
best placed to answer this question, which has puzzled me, which is to shed light
on this strange unit of time called “Elon time.” For example, last year,
I asked Elon, you know, when Tesla would
auto-drive across America, and he said by last December, which is definitely true,
if you take Elon time into account. So what’s the conversion ratio
between Elon time and real time? (Laughter) GS: You put me
in a unique position, Chris. Thanks for that. There’s no question that Elon
is very aggressive on his timelines, but frankly, that drives us
to do things better and faster. I think all the time
and all the money in the world does not yield the best solution, and so putting that pressure on the team
to move quickly is really important. CA: It feels like you play
kind of a key intermediary role here. I mean, he sets these crazy goals
that have their impact, but, in other circumstances,
might blow up a team or set impossible expectations. It feels like you’ve found a way
of saying, “Yes, Elon,” and then making it happen
in a way that is acceptable both to him and to your company,
to your employees. GS: There is two really important
realizations for that. First of all, when Elon says something,
you have to pause and not immediately blurt out,
“Well, that’s impossible,” or, “There’s no way we’re going
to do that. I don’t know how.” So you zip it, and you think about it, and you find ways to get that done. And the other thing I realized, and it made my job satisfaction
substantially harder. So I always felt like my job
was to take these ideas and kind of turn them into company goals,
make them achievable, and kind of roll the company over
from this steep slope, get it comfortable. And I noticed every time
I felt like we were there, we were rolling over,
people were getting comfortable, Elon would throw something out there, and all of a sudden, we’re not comfortable and we’re climbing that steep slope again. But then once I realized
that that’s his job, and my job is to get the company
close to comfortable so he can push again
and put us back on that slope, then I started liking my job a lot more, instead of always being frustrated. CA: So if I estimated
that the conversation ratio for Elon time to your time is about 2x, am I a long way out there? GS: That’s not terrible,
and you said it, I didn’t. (Laughter) CA: You know, looking ahead, one huge initiative SpaceX is believed to be,
rumored to be working on, is a massive network of literally
thousands of low earth orbit satellites to provide high-bandwidth,
low-cost internet connection to every square foot of planet earth. Is there anything
you can tell us about this? GS: We actually don’t chat very much
about this particular project, not because we’re hiding anything, but this is probably
one of the most challenging if not the most challenging
project we’ve undertaken. No one has been successful deploying a huge constellation
for internet broadband, or basically for satellite internet, and I don’t think physics
is the difficulty here. I think we can come up
with the right technology solution, but we need to make a business out of it, and it’ll cost the company
about 10 billion dollars or more to deploy this system. And so we’re marching steadily along but we’re certainly
not claiming victory yet. CA: I mean, the impact of that,
obviously, if that happened to the world, of connectivity everywhere,
would be pretty radical, and perhaps mainly for good — I mean, it changes a lot
if suddenly everyone can connect cheaply. GS: Yeah, there’s no question
it’ll change the world. CA: How much of a worry is it, and how much of a drag
on the planning is it, are concerns just about space junk? People worry a lot about this. This would a huge increase in the total
number of satellites in orbit. Is that a concern? GS: So space debris is a concern,
there’s no question — not because it’s so likely to happen, but the consequences of it happening
are pretty devastating. You could basically spew
a bunch of particles in orbit that could take out that orbit
from being useful for decades or longer. So as a matter of fact, we are required to bring down
our second stage after every mission so it doesn’t end up being
a rocket carcass orbiting earth. So you really need to be
a good steward of that. CA: So despite
the remarkable success there of that Falcon Heavy rocket, you’re actually not focusing on that
as your future development plan. You’re doubling down
to a much bigger rocket called the BFR, which stands for … GS: It’s the Big Falcon Rocket.
CA: The Big Falcon Rocket, that’s right. (Laughter) What’s the business logic of doing this when you invested all that
in that incredible technology, and now you’re just going
to something much bigger. Why? GS: Actually, we’ve learned some lessons over the duration where we’ve
been developing these launch systems. What we want to do is not introduce
a new product before we’ve been able to convince the customers that this
is the product that they should move to, so we’re working on
the Big Falcon Rocket now, but we’re going to continue
flying Falcon 9s and Falcon Heavies until there is absolute
widespread acceptance of BFR. But we are working on it right now, we’re just not going to cancel
Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy and just put in place BFR. CA: The logic is that BFR is what you need
to take humanity to Mars? GS: That’s correct. CA: But somehow, you’ve also found
other business ideas for this. GS: Yes. BFR can take the satellites
that we’re currently taking to orbit to many orbits. It allows for even a new class
of satellites to be delivered to orbit. Basically, the width, the diameter
of the fairing is eight meters, so you can think about
what giant telescopes you can put in that fairing,
in that cargo bay, and see really incredible things and discover incredible things in space. But then there are some
residual capabilities that we have out of BFR as well. CA: A residual capability?
GS: It’s a residual capability. CA: Is that what you call this?
Talk about what the heck this is. Oh wait a sec — GS: That’s Falcon Heavy. That’s worth pointing out, by the way. What a beautiful rocket, and that hangar could just fit
the Statue of Liberty in it, so you get a sense of size
of that Falcon Heavy Rocket. CA: And the fact that
there are 27 engines there. That’s part of the design principle that you, rather than just
inventing ever bigger rockets, you team them up. GS: It’s exactly this residual capability. We developed the Merlin engine
for the Falcon 1 launch vehicle. We could have tossed that engine and built an entirely new engine
for the Falcon 9. It would have been called
something different, because Falcon 9 is nine Merlin engines, but instead of spending a billion dollars
on a brand new engine, we put nine of them together
on the back end of Falcon 9. Residual capability:
glue three Falcon 9s together and you have the largest
operational rocket flying. And so it was expensive to do, but it was a much more efficient path
than starting from scratch. CA: And the BFR is the equivalent
of how much bigger than that, in terms of its power? GS: BFR is about, I believe,
two and half times the size of this. CA: Right, and so that allows you — I mean, I still don’t really believe
this video that we’re about to play here. What on earth is this? GS: So it currently is on earth, but this is basically
space travel for earthlings. I can’t wait for this residual capability. Basically, what we’re going to do
is we’re going to fly BFR like an aircraft and do point-to-point travel on earth, so you can take off
from New York City or Vancouver and fly halfway across the globe. You’ll be on the BFR for roughly
half an hour or 40 minutes, and the longest part —
yeah, it’s so awesome. (Applause) The longest part of that flight
is actually the boat out and back. (Laughter) CA: I mean. Gwynne, come on,
this is awesome, but it’s crazy, right? This is never going to actually happen. GS: Oh no, it’s definitely
going to happen. This is definitely going to happen. CA: How? (Applause) So first of all, countries are going
to accept this incoming missile — (Laughter) GS: Chris, so can you imagine
us trying to convince a federal range, Air Force bases to take the incomers? Because we’re doing it now,
regularly, right? We’re bringing the first stages back, and we’re landing them
on federal property on an Air Force base. So I think doing it, I don’t know, 10 kilometers out from a city, maybe
it’s only five kilometers out from a city. CA: So how many passengers
can possibly afford the fortune of flying by space? GS: So the first BFR is going to have
roughly a hundred passengers. And let’s talk a little bit
about the business. Everyone thinks rockets
are really expensive, and to a large degree they are, and how could we possibly compete
with airline tickets here? But if you think about it,
if I can do this trip in half an hour to an hour, I can do dozens of these a day, right? And yet, a long-haul aircraft
can only make one of those flights a day. So even if my rocket
was slightly more expensive and the fuel is
a little bit more expensive, I can run 10x at least
what they’re running in a day, and really make the revenue
that I need to out of that system. CA: So you really believe this is going
to be deployed at some point in our amazing future. When? GS: Within a decade, for sure. CA: And this is Gwynne time or Elon time? GS: That’s Gwynne time.
I’m sure Elon will want us to go faster. (Laughter) CA: OK, that’s certainly amazing. (Laughter) GS: I’m personally invested in this one,
because I travel a lot and I do not love to travel, and I would love to get to see
my customers in Riyadh, leave in the morning
and be back in time to make dinner. CA: So we’re going to test this out. So within 10 years,
an economy price ticket, or, like, a couple thousand dollars
per person to fly New York to Shanghai. GS: Yeah, I think it’ll be between
economy and business, but you do it in an hour. CA: Yeah, well, OK,
that is definitely something. (Laughter) And meanwhile, the other use
of BFR is being developed to go a little bit further than Shanghai. Talk about this. You guys have actually developed
quite a detailed, sort of, picture of how humans might fly to Mars, and what that would look like. GS: Yeah. So we’ve got a video,
this is a cropped video from others we’ve shown, and then
there’s a couple of new bits to it. But basically, you’re going
to lift off from a pad, you’ve got a booster as well as the BFS,
the Big Falcon Spaceship. It’s going to take off. The booster is going to drop
the spaceship off in orbit, low earth orbit, and then return just like
we’re returning boosters right now. So it sounds incredible,
but we’re working on the pieces, and you can see us achieve these pieces. So booster comes back. The new thing here is that we’re going to actually land
on the pad that we launched from. Currently, we land on a separate pad,
or we land out on a boat. Fast, quick connect. You take a cargo ship full of fuel, or a fuel depot, put it on that booster, get that in orbit, do a docking maneuver,
refuel the spaceship, and head on to your destination, and this one is Mars. CA: So, like, a hundred people
go to Mars at one time, taking, what, six months? Two months? GS: It ends up depending
on how big the rocket is. I think this first version,
and we’ll continue to make even bigger BFRs, I think it’s a three-month trip. Right now, the average is six to eight, but we’re going to try to do it faster. CA: When do you believe SpaceX
will land the first human on Mars? GS: It’s a very similar time frame
from the point-to-point. It’s the same capability. It will be within a decade —
not this decade. CA: In real time, again, within a decade. Well, that would also be amazing. (Laughter) Why, though? Seriously, why? I mean, you’ve got a company
where this is the official stated mission. Has everyone actually
bought into that mission, given that, I mean,
there’s a lot of people around who think, come on,
you’ve got so much talent, so much technology capability. There are so many things on earth
that need urgent attention. Why would you have this escape trip
off to another planet? (Applause) GS: So I am glad you asked that, but I think we need
to expand our minds a little bit. There are plenty of things to do on earth, but there are lots of companies
working on that. I think we’re working on one of
the most important things we possibly can, and that’s to find another place
for humans to live and survive and thrive. If something happened on earth, you need humans living somewhere else. (Applause) It’s the fundamental risk reduction
for the human species. And this does not subvert making our planet here better
and doing a better job taking care of it, but I think you need
multiple paths to survival, and this is one of them. And let’s not talk about the downer piece, like, you go to Mars to make sure
all earthlings don’t die. That’s terrible, actually,
that’s a terrible reason to go do it. Fundamentally,
it’s another place to explore, and that’s what makes humans
different from animals, it’s our sense of exploration
and sense of wonderment and learning something new. And then I also have to say, this is the first step
in us moving to other solar systems and potentially other galaxies, and I think this is the only time
I ever out-vision Elon, because I want to meet other people
in other solar systems. Mars is fine, but it is
a fixer-upper planet. There’s work to do there
to make it habitable. (Laughter) I want to find people,
or whatever they call themselves, in another solar system. CA: That is a big vision. Gwynne Shotwell, thank you. You have one of the most
amazing jobs on the planet. GS: Thank you very much. Thanks, Chris.


  1. Post
    Llama XGaming

    People on other worlds or species(aliens) are demons. Aliens are made from human skin and DNA samples, that's why they abduct people and take samples. They grow our skin and dna until they can wear it. Right now we have aliens(demons) walking the earth. You can even speak to a demon and not realize it. Aliens are a weak attempt of Lucifer for people to fantesize about other worlds and species and deny the existence of God father of Jesus Christ. Some people think that Men in Black is just a movie with Will Smith but it is also real. Almost any story on this planet is real and not just imagination. Dinosaurs are not extinct. They live underground, they have vegetation and light. Light comes thru water and lights inside the earth thru the process of refraction. At one moment God will allow them to come out. Why? To shame scientists that say dinosaurs dissapeared millions of years ago. The dinosaurs will be smarter than the smartest dog on the planet and they will use this intelligence to hunt animals and humans. They will live near waters. Gold will be used as building material as water with go into the ground and gold will surface in huge quantities. We need to aknowledge and repent our sins because the end is near and the judgement of Jesus will be rightheous.

  2. Post

    Holy crap! THIS, is what it looks like to 100% believe in and back what you're doing! THIS, is what it looks like to be living out your dreams! She is the walking talking definition of the result of hard work, determination, and perseverance! This woman is a newly added person to aspire to be like in my life! Thank you so much Gwynne Shotwell for being the epitome of both amazing and awesome!

  3. Post
    frederick winn

    I hope that Space X actually attempts to compete in the super sonic / hyper sonic transportation race (if there is one). Once again, for the wealthy only. I certainly would not buy one of his grid re-charged cars, so i doubt that i would get on one of his "big ****ing spaceships". When these techies do something for Humans, i will let you know what it is, (actually his solar roof, and battery idea is good, but far too expensive ), in the meantime, stay tuned for the Humanitarian Scientific Foundation's evaluations, and awards. 2018 award given to Dr. Aniruth Garg, of India, for his expansion of Lemon Grass as a natural mosquito control.

  4. Post
  5. Post
  6. Post
  7. Post

    Starman is an enigma being the temperature extremes we are told are there would melt the dash and interior and bake and peel the paint and pop the tires facing the sun while the shaded side would be several hundred degrees below zero, and as it tumbled around it would be temperature stressed apart in short order…so I CALL BS ON IT! I'm no flat earthy fool either, I just stated some physics facts any space geek would surmise …How unjaded do they think people are? I mean there are some jaded mofo's out here…XD

  8. Post
    Tony Elsom

    24/06/2019…Such a great women..and with Starlink on it's way, Falcon 9 kicking butt, and STARSHIP under serious development, I can only wait for FH STP-2 launch TODAY…🚀🚀❗️

  9. Post
  10. Post
    Quantum Baboons

    It's great, but. – If that method of travel becomes common place, the impacts on global warming will be atrocious.

  11. Post
  12. Post
  13. Post
  14. Post

    "You've done something that the national space program failet to achive". Well, at least the official one…ehem…Bob Lazar….ehem.

  15. Post
    tim weatherill

    Gwynne just rocks my space-cadet world. She has one of the most important jobs in the world and she wears it so damned well!

  16. Post
    Roy Cornwall

    THE ELECTRO MAGNETIC LAUNCH SYSTEM. Use's rail gun tech. Will jaunch massive loads into space for far, far less. Rockets are for outter space . not for launching off earth !

  17. Post
  18. Post
    Raymond Jay Johnson

    Musk can never do it. Everyone tells me this is true. I've heard since 2003 Elon Musk is only good at vaporware.


  19. Post
  20. Post
  21. Post
    James Conway

    Elon Time: You can't plan the exact date of an epiphany or scientific breakthrough. It has to happen in it's own time naturally. The same is true of achieving an impossible goal or successful mission. You only know the date after it has happened. Elon Musk in a nutshell.

  22. Post
  23. Post
    Boss Okanagan

    At this point in time, there are 19,000 blind imbeciles falling in love with this idea, and only 627 persons bright enough to see through this garbage.

    This is not reality, people. It's nonsense, produced into a CGI as part of Musk's shell game of misdirection that keeps your eyes 'over here' while he screws something else into the ground. If I'm not mistaken, this crap came to light right round the same time Musk made TSLA shareholders pay him billions for Solar City which was $3bil in debt, with an outrageous unverified and unjustified valuation – then he basically shitcanned Solar City once he got paid out.

  24. Post
  25. Post
  26. Post
  27. Post
  28. Post
    Rodney Carpluk

    But how long before airplane companies sue the Space companies? a single luanch can delay 563 flights…

  29. Post
    Rodney Carpluk

    There are are singel companies planning to have multiple luanches a day in a country, and there are multiple countries planning to have luanches. Thats going to be thousands of delayed flights a day…

  30. Post
  31. Post
    Mr Pangy

    Elon time = what technically can be done… Guessing into the future should be accepted as a guessed projection. Real time = social, political, and obstructionist issues. It seems a lot has taken place since this airing.

  32. Post
    Moriah Lee

    Dear NASA,

    …all the time and all the money in the world


    does not yield the best solution,


    and so putting that pressure on the team to move quickly is really important.

    The American Tax Payer

  33. Post
  34. Post
    Scott Bishop

    Mars is a baby step toward what humans need to survive. When the Sun super novas it will vaporize Mars too.

  35. Post

    Is that really progress? Rather than working on giving incredibly wealthy individuals the means to haul their butts even quicker across the earth or glance at it from space at the expense of this planet, they should focus their efforts on doing this:

  36. Post
    Ariel MORANDY

    but why? who cares if millionaires can fly faster around the world? polluting and destroying even more our planet. I dont see any values to this. what we need is to revolutionize how we transport ourselves across the city, and eventually to nearby cities. it means the removal of personal cars, and a global rethink of global transportation. Sorry but flying 5 rich and fat persons from one side of the world to the other has no interest.

  37. Post
  38. Post
    David Payton

    The problem with the internet constellation is physics. Even at the speed of light, (a little faster than radio) ping time is 500 milliseconds. Which means that gaming, namely first person shooters and other twitch games, won't work correctly. Try shooting a kid with 10 millisecond ping time of a ftth system with a clunky 500 millisecond system. Not going to happen. And like it or not, the gaming industry is pushing innovation.

  39. Post
  40. Post
  41. Post
  42. Post
    Bryan Centerfitt

    She was an engineer at Chrysler Fiat!? I hope she wasn't part of their reason why they keep having issues!
    This question comes from a automotive technician by the way.

  43. Post
  44. Post
  45. Post
  46. Post
  47. Post
    Rodney Carpluk

    A single luanch delayed 563 flights…so if there are dozens of luanchs a day… thats going to be thousands of delayed flights…

  48. Post
    Rodney Carpluk

    So…thats going to be tens of millions of dollars that the plane industry will lose, as well as many unhappy passengers…

  49. Post
  50. Post
  51. Post

    AndrewYang2020 WILL FUND THE 10BILLION FOR INTERNET! Elon Musk is for UBI = Sounds like a great partnership!!!!! Imagine if Elon Musk endorse Andrew Yang?

  52. Post
  53. Post
    Christine Ra

    “Mars is a fixer upper planet there’s work to be done there… but I want to meet people, or whatever they call themselves, in other solar systems!” Love this enthusiasm 🚀👩🏻‍🚀

  54. Post
  55. Post
    bringer of the dawn

    How about sending up a huge stretch wire mesh to start cleaning up space debris!!!!!!!!!! Cone on!!!!

  56. Post
  57. Post
    Daniel Filippus

    I don't think there is life beyond the earth. I think the universe surrounds around us and we are the centerpiece of everything. The universe was created for us.

  58. Post
    Md Device

    Imagine a future where intercontinental ballistic rockets are launched hundreds of times per day around the world…

  59. Post
  60. Post
  61. Post
    Cameron H

    In 2002 I created a hydrogen powered pressure washer. Then a hydrogen powered boat in 2011. Next year, a hydrogen powered Dam!

  62. Post
  63. Post
    Adriana Gallo

    Felicitaciones from Argentina Buenos aires 🌷🌷🌷🌷🌷🌷🌷🌷🌷🌷👍👏👏👏👏👏👏💖💖💖

  64. Post
    Roderick Horton

    It would take you 30 minutes long to ease up to that velocity and another 30 minutes to slow down for safe landing. Plus the time to get from point a to point b.

  65. Post
  66. Post
    protools fanatic

    What a huge waste of money to send people to a place where they either wont make it alive or wont last long on mars.

  67. Post
    Stephen Courton

    Don’t see it for replacing even very long flights but as Space tourism could be huge. Bet could book 100 people each week for a two orbit, 3-4 hour flight for $25k? Many people could save that much as a bucket item, to see earth from space, float weightlessly for hours. Eventually even maybe a orbital hotel?

  68. Post
  69. Post
  70. Post
  71. Post
  72. Post
    Tammy Leeder Whitaker

    Sweet Jesus. . Employee number 7? WOW! Your name as well. And MARS…… POWERFUL… Congratulations on your promotion! Love Elon. 17 years now. Elon TIME 🕰️⌛🔭🌠🌙☀️🌠☄️🌑🇺🇸🌹 Ms. TREE! Eclipse of the MOON on July 27, 2018
    My birthday! FALCON. Love it! They called Uncle Tommy Mr. Falcon of the Atlanta Falcons.

  73. Post
    Makeup Mobster

    Who else can’t wait to come back to this video in another decade or so to comment about whether or not any of this happened?

  74. Post
  75. Post
  76. Post
  77. Post
  78. Post
  79. Post
  80. Post
  81. Post

    Fast travelling on Earth is destructive, we dont NEED to travel, we have the internet to exchange information. All it does is using ressources for comfort. The only travel we NEED is space travel, at this point.

    Tourism is destructive consumerism, as is shipping wares instead of producing them as locally as possible.

  82. Post
  83. Post
  84. Post

    Sorry, but the planet doesn't need this crap. We even need to fly less to save the atmosphere. Just because we can do something technically difficult doesn't mean we should do it. I'm not a Luddite either, I'm an engineer but our first priority should be to protect the planet.

  85. Post
  86. Post
  87. Post
    Larry Carmody CMD

    This was a year & half ago,
    1.5 yrs ago. A lot has happened since then. Like a hop of the short BFR. & many other things.
    I'll be 90yrs old in ten yrs, so I guess I cld take a flight to Japan in 30 minutes, go have late supper tomorrow in Japan, then come back to Florida in the BFR into yesterday for lunch. If I left Florida at 6:00 am on Tuesday it'd be 6:00 PM on Wednesday in Japan, so, I go have supper there, get on the BFR go back to Florida into yesterday for lunch at 12:00 noon. Wldn't that be a great trip.

  88. Post
    South Coast

    I find the argument about fixing Earth first to be so moronic..!!!
    The irony of making this argument against arguably the only company on earth who’s mission is to save it..

  89. Post

    There is more to it then that. I believe i found out that an underground army obtained classified information from that project and plans to use it on the american people to take power

  90. Post
  91. Post
  92. Post
  93. Post
  94. Post
  95. Post
  96. Post
    Salamanka zhang

    Once the atomic warfare happend, the spaceX can help rich family escape from earth, poor people will not, that's really point. Then we just live like MAD MAX in earth.

  97. Post
    Empire Protege

    Anytime someone say's "Why? Why travel to space? We have problems here" you can use this anology, no matter the religion or belief: We all agree we came from the fertile crescent? Africa and the Middle East was the cradle of humanity. But what if we never left there, what if we said "why leave here? We have problems here to solve?"
    But we didn't, we went forward to explore and build "colonies" in Europe, Asia, North and South America. If anything, that helped our progress to solve these problems.
     "The Earth is the cradle of humanity, but mankind cannot stay in the cradle forever." – Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, founding father of modern rocketry and astronautics.

  98. Post
  99. Post
  100. Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *